I prefer the less amusement park, gimmicky scheme. The area in it's natural form is beautiful, lets not ruin it and make careful choices of how to enhance the site, while providing areas of discovery and play. I'd like to see less turf and more unprogrammed, exploratory and natural areas.

I completely agree that the area should be minimally developed and that its natural character and scenic beauty should be left intact, so that it does not wind up looking and feeling like an amusement park, or, just as bad, overcome with concrete. I would like to see portions of the park left undeveloped, with some areas carefully enhanced to invite children and adults to experience nature. I would also like to see some small areas developed in such a way as to invite small/moderate size community gatherings or possibly intimate, smaller scale cultural events or concerts.

I agree with the first two comments that I'd like to see this less developed to look like an artificial park and keep in the theme of natural park instead.

I love the Ridgeline trail system and I'd like to see similar opportunities in the PSM park. Like the other folks who commented, I think the natural character of the area is worth preserving.

The natural area is so beautiful, I'd like the planning folks to maintain the natural surroundings but utilize the flatter acreage (Which isn't a lot) for the more traditional park like features.

Trails, informational and historical signage, the occasional feature.... that's all we need.